Injustice
in a Watchtower Pedophilia
Case
Jerry Bergman Ph.D.
(Investigator 98, 2004
September)
A recent
Canadian court
decision should disturb
any person who is concerned about protecting children against sexual
abuse.
The case concerns Vicki Boer, a young woman who was sexually molested
by
her father between the ages of eleven and fourteen. She went to her
Watchtower
elders in an attempt to stop the abuse, and they told her not
to
seek outside help, nor even to report the abuse to the authorities.
Rather,
they told her, she should confront her abuser and allow him to "repent"
of his sins.
Trying to do
what was
right, she dutifully
followed the Elders advice. Vicki later said that the forced
confrontation
was very traumatizing for her and led to a rocky adolescence that
eventually
caused a nervous breakdown. It also caused her to be ostracized by her
family and friends and others in her small southern Ontario community
of
Shelburne, about a hundred kilometers north of Toronto.
In an effort to
deal with
her past, Vicki
was encouraged by the insight she gained from her psychiatrist (and
others)
to file charges against the church, which condoned the abuse and
prevented
her from getting the help that she needed earlier in life. She
eventually
prevailed in court, the judge ruling that the Watchtower Society was
clearly
negligent in their treatment of Ms. Boer. Although Vicki sued for civil
damages of close to over three quarters of a million dollars, the
judge,
her Honor Justice Anne Molley, awarded her only the pittance of five
thousand
dollars!
This amount did
not even
cover her direct
legal expenses. After a later court hearing to determine court costs,
Justice
Molley ruled on September 29, 2003, that Vicki Boer should pay all
legal costs to the Watchtower back to the year 2001. The Watchtower
claimed
their costs amounted to $142,000! Plus she had to pay her own legal
costs,
which were an additional $92,000. The total she had to pay was nearly a
quarter of a million dollars! In Canada the party that loses a case is
normally required to pay all of the court costs of both sides.
For a child
victim of a
sexual assault to
be required to pay a quarter of a million dollars after prevailing in
court
is a good example of why so many people are contemptuous of the justice
system. Canada is a Western nation that claims to be a Democracy and a
supporter of human rights. The reason the judge gave for assigning the
victim legal costs was that the Watchtower offered $20,000 to settle
the
case, then during pretrial motions they raised their offer to $56,000
and
an apology (but required her to sign an overly broad gag order). The
gag
order stated if Vicki (or even her family) let slip the terms of
settlement,
they will be liable for millions of dollars in damages! Vicki rejected
the offer on the advice of her lawyers but, more importantly, also on
the
advice of the pretrial judge! As a result of accepting the advice of
these
learned men, Vicki will likely be in debt for the rest of her life.
This
outcome will no doubt put a serious strain on her marriage, and her
ability
to care for her children.
Ironically, the
lawsuit
was handled largely
by W. Glenn Howe and Associates, a firm in which all the lawyers and
secretaries
must sign a vow of poverty and volunteer their time without
compensation
(except for room and board) at the church's Canadian headquarters in
Georgetown,
Ontario, northwest of Toronto. There was no material dispute of the
events
leading up to the court case. All agreed that the plaintiff was
repeatedly
sexually assaulted. Vicki and her husband are not able to appeal
because
they have exhausted their finances pursuing the case thus far. The cost
of justice is beyond the means of ordinary people in Canada. Just to
obtain
the court transcripts alone will cost them over $10,000!
In an article in
the
Canadian press, Vicki
said, "They took away my childhood; they took away so much from me, and
now the justice system makes it so they can take the rest of my dignity
and what I have left of my family." (Cameron, 2003). She originally
sought
over $700,000 from the elders involved for negligence of their duty to
protect children, but she has been ordered to pay the losing party in
the
case one-quarter of a million dollars! In her words "The organization
that
protects child abusers makes money off of me."
It also seems
the message
is quite clear:
if you were abused and traumatized as a child, there is no point in
seeking
justice in the courts because you may end up being abused even more. In
Vicki's words, "I felt like I was raped again." This case is not a
matter
of "he said, she said" allegations as is so common in these kind of
cases.
Vicki was clearly under-age, only a child when the sexual assault
occurred
and, therefore, consent claims are irrelevant. By comparison, a 55-year
old man was convicted by an American jury recently of incest with his
daughter.
He was sentenced to 24 years in prison by Judge John F. Surbeck, Jr.
(Eaton,
2004, p. 6c). The sex offenses occurred when the girl was from age 15
to
16.
Nor is Canada
always
lenient with pedophiliacs.
The Catholic diocese of Sue Saint Marie, Ontario, was just ordered to
pay
almost 1.5 million dollars to a man who was molested by a priest. Why
the
enormous difference in sentence disparity? One case involved homosexual
behavior and the Catholic Church; the other case, heterosexual
pedophilia
and the Watchtower Society. Why do we allow such enormous disparity to
occur? As one lawyer told me, even if you have a solid case, going to
court
is like playing Russian roulette. If the judge had a bad day, you could
end up having a bad life.
References
Boer, Vicki.
2003.
Interviews, various dates.
Cameron,
Peter. 2003.
Women who won $5,000
in a sex abuse case against church must pay legal costs, Toronto
(Canadian
Press Report)
Eaton, Sara.
2004.
"Father Handed 24-Year
Term for Incest." The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette, Feb. 26, p.
6C.
Molloy,
Anne. Reasons
for Judgment Released
June 26, 2003. Court File No. 9K-CV-154117
Postscript
<>The Watchtower
Society,
likely due to adverse
publicity in this case, have since this case was decided now agreed not
to require Vicki to pay their court costs. Likely they realized that
she
could never pay their claimed costs anyway. This is an ironic state of
affairs because the convicted "criminals" in this case displayed more
justice
and compassion than the court that convicted them! Vicki still must pay
her own legal costs, and is thus saddled with an almost 100,000 dollar
debt.
>
|